I wrote about the Fiasco of .XXX few days ago. A casual observer might conclude the following:
1. ICANN board approved .XXX
2. US government (DoC) halt .XXX delegation
3. GAC stepped in one day after (2) to give US governments it some legimitacy
However, there is another different explaination of the realty which is also very plausible.
1. ICANN board didn’t really like .XXX but couldn’t find any ground to reject it.
2. Some GAC members began to express concerns about .XXX only as the delegation date approaches
3. GAC Chair decided to write letter to ICANN which of course, has to be circulate among the members first for approval
4. US DoC decided to send letter one day before GAC does to claim credit for halting .XXX and score some brownies points with the conservatives at home.
Which is the truth? Make your own guesses.
Note: Regardless which version of the truth you believe, it does not change my observation that the fiasco is a lose-lose for ICANN.
